<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Success with the Canon WFT-E2 - Digital SLR - tribe.net</title>
    <link>http://digitalslr.tribe.net/thread/a109f620-8685-494b-83ca-ffb4e3533c90?format=rss</link>
    <description>Tribe.net. Local Connections</description>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Success with the Canon WFT-E2</title>
      <link>http://DigitalSLR.tribe.net/thread/a109f620-8685-494b-83ca-ffb4e3533c90#684b8a47-3c4e-4a0c-a8c1-3abfb5a89a18</link>
      <description>You are right Gary. I'm reasonably competent as a sysadmin, though that's not even my main advocation. &#xD;
&#xD;
It took me quite a while to figure this thing out! The user manual is totally useless. Now that it actually work,  what's amazing is how well engineered it really is, it's quite flexible. But a certain amount of computer configuration know-how is required to get a first-ever result .... if you lack that, or any one thing is not working, you cannot get there from here. I had numerous starts that were each 1-2 steps away from working, but I didn't know this.&#xD;
&#xD;
Wish you well.&#xD;
&#xD;
Blessings and Light,&#xD;
M</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://DigitalSLR.tribe.net/thread/a109f620-8685-494b-83ca-ffb4e3533c90#684b8a47-3c4e-4a0c-a8c1-3abfb5a89a18</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-22T05:24:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Success with the Canon WFT-E2</title>
      <link>http://DigitalSLR.tribe.net/thread/a109f620-8685-494b-83ca-ffb4e3533c90#d11a396c-fd10-4dbf-ae65-3ef9d1439e62</link>
      <description>I tend to totally agree abject, but .... &#xD;
&#xD;
Wireless is wireless. It's very much better than having cabling tied to the  camera, IMHO, whatever the price for doing so. I kind of wish that I'd devote the money to the 28-105mm f/4L lens instead, but it became a sunk cost.&#xD;
&#xD;
At a previous shoot in LA, years ago, I already learned my lesson having wired cabling anywhere near my camera. It was close enough for a belly dancer to kick over ... which was the very first damage I sustained in belly dance, a br0ken 16-36mm f/2.8L lens.&#xD;
&#xD;
I used the unit at a photo shoot today, and it worked fabulously. We checked our work on the laptop, all day long. Just incredible.&#xD;
&#xD;
I could work tethered, but I per above, I've found cabling quite an anathma to freedom to move about ...&#xD;
&#xD;
Blessigns and Light,&#xD;
M</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:19:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://DigitalSLR.tribe.net/thread/a109f620-8685-494b-83ca-ffb4e3533c90#d11a396c-fd10-4dbf-ae65-3ef9d1439e62</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-22T05:19:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Success with the Canon WFT-E2</title>
      <link>http://DigitalSLR.tribe.net/thread/a109f620-8685-494b-83ca-ffb4e3533c90#ec4fd916-2c09-4ad6-baa7-e7aba7e728b3</link>
      <description>Wow, that sounds ugly. I know you too are a compiler guy and solve bizarre technical problems on computers as a day job so I can only speculate how awful it would have been for the typical man on the street (so to speak.)</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:59:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://DigitalSLR.tribe.net/thread/a109f620-8685-494b-83ca-ffb4e3533c90#ec4fd916-2c09-4ad6-baa7-e7aba7e728b3</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-22T01:59:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Success with the Canon WFT-E2</title>
      <link>http://DigitalSLR.tribe.net/thread/a109f620-8685-494b-83ca-ffb4e3533c90#31b6b970-5dfb-4e8e-bd6d-cb6af9010161</link>
      <description>Cool, I can't afford the $1000 price tag for the wireless transmitter, me thinks $25 Belkin USB 2.0 to mini USB "b" was a $925 richer decision.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:38:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://DigitalSLR.tribe.net/thread/a109f620-8685-494b-83ca-ffb4e3533c90#31b6b970-5dfb-4e8e-bd6d-cb6af9010161</guid>
      <dc:creator>abject</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-21T19:38:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Success with the Canon WFT-E2</title>
      <link>http://DigitalSLR.tribe.net/thread/a109f620-8685-494b-83ca-ffb4e3533c90#c829dea7-bdb3-41bf-9738-9eacbb071427</link>
      <description>After several configuration attempts across several months, today I was finally able to get the Canon WFT-E2 wireless transmitter to wirelessly transmit photo data from a Canon EOS 1D Mark III, directly onto a MacBook. &#xD;
&#xD;
Then on top of that, I got a script for automator that works with Aperture to read the incoming photos from a folder in realtime, and then import and display them, while storing them into an Aperture library. &#xD;
&#xD;
It finally all became clear, and just worked. Ohhhh this is so fabulous! Everything I shoot with the camera goes to the computer, automatically. And it can be auto-displayed as well.&#xD;
&#xD;
Apologies if this wireless capability is old-hat to some of you ...Ugh, it took me quite a while to figure this out.&#xD;
&#xD;
Blessings and Light,&#xD;
M</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 03:06:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://DigitalSLR.tribe.net/thread/a109f620-8685-494b-83ca-ffb4e3533c90#c829dea7-bdb3-41bf-9738-9eacbb071427</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-21T03:06:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>



