Advertisement
A co worker bought a Rebel XTI and brought it into work to show me. I was rather disapointed in the quality of the feel alone. the digital readout was rather cheesy as well. It is a 10 meg sensor and the photos seem ok. No image stabilization with two lenses it seems exceedingly light (no metal frame?) all plastic feel sems to give it a cheap "feel" with a toss away when done appearance to me. Is this just me or was this an entry level piece? Entry level or not at $1000 for the package.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Hey nice frame......
Thu, May 29, 2008 - 7:43 PMYes, the Rebel series are entry-level cameras. The build quality isn't the best, as you've pointed out, but they're exceptionally capable cameras. I have a 5D, and I still use my XT from time to time.
-
Re: Hey nice frame......
Thu, May 29, 2008 - 8:47 PMAlso, the Canon Rebel XTi, and the newer Rebel XSi cost below $1000, with the older Rebel XTi model considerably less. The Canon 30D, which was replaced by the 40D, has substantially better build-quality. Price for the discontinued model is also probably less than $1000, or close anyway. The Rebels are ground-breaking in price/performance, as Patti pointed out, but the 20D/30D/40D prosumer models have the titanium shell body construction.
In a slightly related topic, I've discovered that the Canon Rebel line figures rather prominently in digital astrophotography. Here, the light weight and excellent low-noise imaging performance is quite an advantage for telescope mounting. The combined mass of camera and telescope is better situated for the tracking-mount of the telescope for these very long-exposure applications. Lastly, the low-cost of the Canon Rebel line lends itself to either DIY or professional removal of the infrared moiré filter in the camera, a huge boon to low-light astrophoto applications.