Advertisement
15.1 MP, Digic 4, 3" LCD with 920K pixels, and HD Video up to 1920 x 1080, with HDMI out, ISO expansion to 6400 and 12800 ...
apparently for <$900 SRP ...
www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller
www.dpreview.com/previews/canoneos500d/
apparently for <$900 SRP ...
www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller
www.dpreview.com/previews/canoneos500d/
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Canon EOS Rebel T1i
Sat, March 28, 2009 - 12:59 PMCorrection: in body-only configuration, < $800 SRP.
-
Re: Canon EOS Rebel T1i
Sat, March 28, 2009 - 3:14 PMAnd it has a built-in flash... Take that 5D Mark II! -
-
Re: Canon EOS Rebel T1i
Sat, March 28, 2009 - 4:29 PMWell, that's a great lead to follow up with the new Speedlite 270EX that was simultaneously introduced with the EOS Rebel T1i ... it's a apparently a smaller pocket-size unit which runs on 2 AA batteries, and has a bounce-flash orientation scheme.
www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller
Having said all that, I'll opine that the reason that the 5D Mark II doesn't have built-in flash is because Canon is trying to position it as a professional camera. These down-market DSLR cameras with built-in flash lack any serious light-modification capability to the built-in flash. What the built-in flash does is provide for fully automatic photography in dim light using medium-speed to slow EOS lenses, sometimes with pretty good results. A smart photographer can do more than this, but the optical arrangement of the built-in flash is the very definition of a red-eye producing scheme, because it's still way too close to the central axis of the camera's view. The light source and the view are just too close, and without serious diffusion, the impinging light is going to be relatively harsh in dim-light, producing a lovely black flash shadow behind your subject(s).
In the case where you have good light, even the fill-flash capability is going to be too close to the view to always illuminate well for faces, because the light is again flush with the horizontal plane in the camera view: directly in peoples' faces. Then one still needs to consider the potential for red-eye. In that case, bounce flash for fill is far more providential.
To summarize: IMHO, the built-in flash on a DSLR degrades an otherwise great camera into the point-and-shoot class. Canon puts in this feature so that amateurs can have better quality photos automatically than they would have without it.
The Speedlite 270EX, with positionable head, looks like a modest answer to the optical problems caused by built-in flash on a Canon DSLR.
are just not so good for The main thing you get -
-
Re: Canon EOS Rebel T1i
Sat, March 28, 2009 - 4:30 PMsorry for my stupid edits, in this last post...
-
-
Re: Canon EOS Rebel T1i
Sat, March 28, 2009 - 9:03 PMBah. Built-in flash is essentially useless. And I much prefer that space being used for a better viewfinder. -
-
-
Re: Canon EOS Rebel T1i
Sun, March 29, 2009 - 1:27 AMExactly. The market for Rebel-class cameras, which is largely made up of former point & shoot users, expects pop-up flash. There's very little intersection between that market and people who would buy a 5D/1D class camera.
-
-
Re: Canon EOS Rebel T1i
Sun, March 29, 2009 - 1:06 PMI agree whole-heartedly.
The much darker viewfinder brightness is the first thing I notice when I pick up any camera deploying an APS-C image sensor. It's got to be about 1 stop darker to see through, compared to a 5D/1D class camera.
-
Unsu...
Re: Canon EOS Rebel T1i
Wed, April 29, 2009 - 1:31 PMSo what do you recommend for a camera that a former point and shoot photographer needs to move up to Digital SLR without spending $1500? -
-
Re: Canon EOS Rebel T1i
Wed, April 29, 2009 - 6:31 PMSerenus,
For brand-new cameras, the Canon EOS Rebel T1i, or the new Canon EOS 50D will fit a budget < $1500.
If you can swallow the modest difference in price, I'd say that that 50D is more fully featured, and would serve many advanced needs. The aforementioned Rebel T1i though is a terrific camera, just not as fully featured as the 50D. If you want more ultimate creativity in the longer run, the 50D is indicated, albeit it's hovering around ~$1K in price. Here are some links to help you decide (perhaps copied in duplicate from other posts):
www.dpreview.com/previews/canoneos500d/
www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos50d/
A very worthwhile feature on both the T1i and the 50D is the 3.0" 920K pixel LCD screen. Even my professional Canon EOS 1D Mark III camera does not even have this LCD capability, kinda annoying really. The extra detail that is visible this way is going to be immensely helpful for critical previewing. Such as for product or print work, where little details matter. Now you could work tethered to a computer, but that's not always useful or easy, for example, for a location shoot. The very fine display in the LCD will help a lot when having the laptop tied to the camera is not useful or possible. Another example I can readily think of is using Live Preview for astrophotography, where you can watch the Moon and stars directly in the LCD, when the camera is tied to a telescope. This view with the (digital) zoom engaged Immensely helpful for tack-sharp focusing with the telecope's focuser. On my 1D Mark III, with Live View you can literally see the wavering atmosphere against the fleeting lunar landscape; with the T1i/50D, the detail would be enormously better while waiting for "still air" to take the best shot.
To the extent you are willing to climb > $1000, you'll will then have budget for non-professional or pro-sumer lenses and/or a Speedlite accessory. A Speedlite, plus a flash diffuser will enable much better people photography than the built-in flash can offer.
What lenses that may be best for the camera depends on what you want to do. However, for modest low-light, there is always the ~$80 "Nifty Fifty" 50mm f/1.8 lens. Also, medium speed zooms (e.g. f/3.5-4.5) may more tenable now, because on cameras like the 50D, the highest ISO with good noise quality is ISO 3200; however, incredibly fast ISO 6400 and ISO 12800 are even available on this camera, which allows the use of slower zoom lenses in places that heretofore were not tenable, even with higher noise. This situation might not be so bad photographing (say) a fire arts performance in the near dark for a Burning Man type of gig.
Hope you have great fun and much creative work, with whatever DSLR you decide to obtain.
Blessings and Light,
M
-
-